Newton also recognized that weight as measured by the action of weighing was affected by environmental factors such as buoyancy. This allowed him to consider concepts as true position and true velocity. Newton considered time and space to be absolute. In particular, Newton considered weight to be relative to another object causing the gravitational pull, e.g. Mass was identified as a fundamental property of objects connected to their inertia, while weight became identified with the force of gravity on an object and therefore dependent on the context of the object. Weight became fundamentally separate from mass. The introduction of Newton's laws of motion and the development of Newton's law of universal gravitation led to considerable further development of the concept of weight. Ultimately, he concluded weight was proportionate to the amount of matter of an object, not the speed of motion as supposed by the Aristotelean view of physics. He proposed a way to measure the difference between the weight of a moving object and an object at rest. In the 17th century, Galileo made significant advances in the concept of weight. The rise of the Copernican view of the world led to the resurgence of the Platonic idea that like objects attract but in the context of heavenly bodies. The concept of gravitas was eventually replaced by Jean Buridan's impetus, a precursor to momentum. Weight was split into a "still weight" or pondus, which remained constant, and the actual gravity or gravitas, which changed as the object fell. As medieval scholars discovered that in practice the speed of a falling object increased with time, this prompted a change to the concept of weight to maintain this cause-effect relationship. Īccording to Aristotle, weight was the direct cause of the falling motion of an object, the speed of the falling object was supposed to be directly proportionate to the weight of the object. The first operational definition of weight was given by Euclid, who defined weight as: "the heaviness or lightness of one thing, compared to another, as measured by a balance." Operational balances (rather than definitions) had, however, been around much longer. Archimedes saw weight as a quality opposed to buoyancy, with the conflict between the two determining if an object sinks or floats. He ascribed absolute weight to earth and absolute levity to fire. To Aristotle, weight and levity represented the tendency to restore the natural order of the basic elements: air, earth, fire and water. Plato described weight as the natural tendency of objects to seek their kin. These were typically viewed as inherent properties of objects. Weighing grain, from the Babur-namah ĭiscussion of the concepts of heaviness (weight) and lightness (levity) date back to the ancient Greek philosophers. History Ancient Greek official bronze weights dating from around the 6th century BC, exhibited in the Ancient Agora Museum in Athens, housed in the Stoa of Attalus. The current situation is that a multiple set of concepts co-exist and find use in their various contexts. In the teaching community, a considerable debate has existed for over half a century on how to define weight for their students. įurther complications in elucidating the various concepts of weight have to do with the theory of relativity according to which gravity is modeled as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime. comparing and converting force weight in pounds to mass in kilograms and vice versa). Although weight and mass are scientifically distinct quantities, the terms are often confused with each other in everyday use (e.g. For example, an object with a mass of one kilogram has a weight of about 9.8 newtons on the surface of the Earth, and about one-sixth as much on the Moon. The unit of measurement for weight is that of force, which in the International System of Units (SI) is the newton. In this sense of weight, terrestrial objects can be weightless: so if one ignores air resistance, one could say the legendary apple falling from the tree, on its way to meet the ground near Isaac Newton, was weightless. Thus, in a state of free fall, the weight would be zero. Yet others define it as the magnitude of the reaction force exerted on a body by mechanisms that counteract the effects of gravity: the weight is the quantity that is measured by, for example, a spring scale. Others define weight as a scalar quantity, the magnitude of the gravitational force. Some standard textbooks define weight as a vector quantity, the gravitational force acting on the object. In science and engineering, the weight of an object is the force acting on the object due to acceleration or gravity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |